Skip to Main Navigation

Strategic climate policy with offsets and incomplete abatement : carbon taxes versus cap-and-trade (英语)

This paper provides a first analysis of a 'policy bloc' of fossil fuel importers which implements an optimal coordinated climate policy, faces a (non-policy) fringe of other fuel importers, and a bloc of exporters, and purchases offset from the fringe. The author compares a carbon tax and a cap-and trade scheme for the policy bloc, which in either case is accompanied by an efficient offset mechanism for reducing emissions in the fringe. The policy bloc is then shown to prefer a tax over a cap, since only a tax leads to a lower fuel export price and by more when the policy bloc is larger. Offsets are also more favorable to the policy bloc under a tax than under a cap. The optimal offset price under a carbon tax is below the tax rate, while under a cap and free quota trading the offset price must equal the quota price. The domestic carbon and offset prices are both higher under a tax than under a cap when the policy bloc is small. When the policy bloc is larger, the offset price can be higher under a cap. Fringe countries gain by mitigation in the policy bloc, and more under a carbon tax since the fuel import price is lower.


  • 作者


  • 文件日期


  • 报告号


  • 卷号


  • Total Volume(s)


  • 国家


  • 地区


  • 发布日期


  • Disclosure Status


  • 文件名称

    Strategic climate policy with offsets and incomplete abatement : carbon taxes versus cap-and-trade

  • 关键词

    carbon tax;greenhouse gas emission reduction;climate policy;fossil fuel consumption;offset price;fuel demand;carbon price;gains and losses;excise tax revenue;amount of fuel;aggregate demand function;fossil fuel import;amount of abatement;consumer fuel price;absence of transfer;quality control mechanism;Environment & Energy;strategic trade policy;price of emission;quantity of fuel;unit of emissions;climate policy strategy;difference in outcomes;global climate change;terms of trade;energy tax policy;taxation of energy;marginal energy cost;cambridge university press;fuel export;import price;tax case;export price;carbon emission;export tax;trade price;emission cap;public economics;domestic carbon;incentive payment;aggregate utility;partial derivative;fuel exporter;quota trade;total emissions;asymmetric information;carbon pricing;carbon trading;fossil energy;dynamic model;fuel tax;equilibrium concept;emissions price;mitigation policy;total fuel;market equilibrium;climate impact;supply function;energy economics;market power;fuel supply;global emission;Global Warming;downward pressure;resource economics;static analysis;resource extraction;fuel supplier;oil wealth;ongoing research;dynamic process;competitive fringe;incentive mechanism;carbon quota;tariff agreement;optimal tariff;exhaustible resource;international economics;nonrenewable resource;environmental economics;free trading;carbon leakage;oil import;policy regime;future research;emission right;emission offsets;market mechanism;bargaining power;domestic trade;case studied;population size;short period;fuel production;public policy;international tax;public finance;emission level;climate effect;strategic behavior;welfare effect;high emissions;differential game;public demand;net emission;emerging economy;Emerging economies;carbon taxation;excess emissions;oil demand;proportional increase;exogenous parameter;bloc size;domestic tax;comparative static;small nations;competitive condition;mitigation cost;tax rate;maximum extent;corner solution;marginal productivity;emission quota;transfer payment;market clearing;executive board;tax parameter;energy policies;free allocation;ecological economics;emission credit;carbon market;co2 emission;international agreement;public choice;fuel extraction;emission permit;profit function;fuel market;emissions externalities;informational problem;petroleum producer;demand reduction;small fraction;net profit;fringe benefit;economic model;central authority;political pressure;equilibrium emission;industry lobby;Political Economy;free rider;private trade;trade scheme;welfare level;parameter value;energy resource;price differentiation;net return;welfare gains;