Skip to Main Navigation

Panama - Sustainable Production Systems and Conservation of Biodiversity Project (英语)

Ratings for the Sustainable Production Systems and Conservation of Biodiversity Project for Panama were as follows: outcome and Bank performance was satisfactory and monitoring and evaluation (M and E) quality was substantial. Some lessons learned include: the endowment fund (EF) illustrates how with strong government buy-in, a moderate amount of seed funding can be leveraged to build up a much larger fund for conservation. It is critical to mobilize multiple, diverse sources of conservation funding. Subprojects can serve as a critical proof-of-concept to jumpstart public and private investment in an innovative solution to a challenge. Multi-sector approaches to biodiversity conservation can play a critical role in capturing livelihood benefits for low-income and marginalized groups and diversifying the base for conservation financing. The project can have better demonstrated its positive impacts on livelihoods and inclusion if it had included socio-economic, intermediate indicators. Monitoring and evaluation strategies for biodiversity outcomes need careful assessment during project preparation.

详细

  • 文件日期

    2020/08/28

  • 文件类型

    完成执行与成果报告

  • 报告号

    ICR4905

  • 卷号

    1

  • Total Volume(s)

    1

  • 国家

    巴拿马,

  • 地区

    拉丁美洲与加勒比海区,

  • 发布日期

    2020/09/03

  • Disclosure Status

    Disclosed

  • 文件名称

    Panama - Sustainable Production Systems and Conservation of Biodiversity Project

  • 关键词

    Environmental and Social Management Framework; economic and financial analysis; Urban and Rural Development; buffer zone; Environmental Management Plan; effective technical assistance; changes in land use; Internal rate of return; Below the Poverty Line; Agriculture, Fishing and Forestry; economic value of biodiversity; private sector mining company; globally significant biodiversity; enhanced biodiversity protection; conservation of biodiversity; level of biodiversity; income-generating opportunity; measure of use; negative environmental impact; agriculture and livestock; benefits of biodiversity; Natural Resource Management; private sector financing; Poverty & Inequality; global environmental benefits; Water Resource Management; improved water quality; amount of fund; lack of incentive; species of bird; multilateral environmental agreement; number of beneficiaries; components of biodiversity; species of plant; national biodiversity; globally important biodiversity; assessment of achievement; Finance for Development; poverty alleviation effort; biodiversity conservation efforts; global biodiversity conservation; renewable natural resource; inclusive economic growth; appellation of origin; grievance redress mechanism; global environmental facility; social discount rate; net present value; costs of investment; annual financing gap; agriculture and forestry; availability of information; estimates of income; community base; land use planning; high poverty rate; private sector engagement; forest fire fighting; amount of water; private sector actors; global environment facility; important environmental services; productive area; protected area; educational activities; environmental standard; biodiversity considerations; Mainstreaming Biodiversity; land area; financial gap; biodiversity monitoring; long-term sustainability; productive activity; Natural Resources; intermediate indicator; indigenous communities; indigenous community; environmental certification; incremental cost; flagship species; biodiversity information; direct beneficiaries; raise awareness; global effort; geographic location; conservation status; financial indicator; sustainable livelihood; park boundary; adversely impact; international conservation; private land; habitat fragmentation; ecosystem service; conservation organizations; project costing; landscape approach; buffer area; water infiltration; Carbon sequestration; business alliance; sustainable management; financing shortfall; water flow; financial sustainability; production system; conservation program; first stage; Financing plans; coconut oil; business management; consulting service; scientific literature; Indicator Target; Consulting services; standards development; knowledge generation; business capacity; environmental plan; government revenue; programme implementation; sustainable production; biodiversity indicator; coastal habitat; coastal ecosystem; sustainable agriculture; economic sector; living resources; efficient production; human pressure; social assistance; results framework; counterpart contribution; agriculture sector; territorial development; supplementary information; autonomous entity; leading organizations; effectiveness condition; outcome targets; project intervention; plant biodiversity; private company; school day; home consumption; sea level; coffee producer; project yield; financing source; decentralization policy; indigenous area; indigenous group; marketing opportunities; project financing; community tourism; Organic Agriculture; producer association; production practice; organic horticulture; organic coffee; business partner; business skill; procurement issue; market price; forested areas; carbon dioxide; economic valuation; production cost; secondary information; sustainable practices; organic product; financial return; beneficiary contribution; evaluation period; positive return; annual budget; baseline cost; financial datum; raise funds; gap analysis; commonly known

下载

完整報告

正式文件版本(可能有签字)