Skip to Main Navigation

Korea - Kwangju and Seoul Sewerage Project (英语)

The outcome of the project is satisfactory, sustainability is highly likely, and the institutional development impact is substantial. Key lessons reinforce the importance of strong ownership, particularly by city governments, to ensure success, and sustainability of a project. Therefore, extensive involvement of the water agencies, and support from the city government in a comprehensive wastewater strategy, would be instrumental for making gains in this area. In addition, it has been proven that financial covenants requiring a financial rate of return of 2-3 percent for wastewater agencies, is unrealistic under huge capital outlays over the short time. It is suggested therefore, that financial objectives of operations in the wastewater sector, should better focus on promoting financial viability, such as internal cash generation, and prudent financial management. Although privatization of wastewater facilities in Kwangju was not included in the project design, it was successfully implemented, and thus, Seoul is considering pilot schemes for one of its wastewater treatment plants. This shows that opportunities for efficiency enhancement through private participation exist, and should be considered early in project design.

详细

  • 文件日期

    2000/06/29

  • 文件类型

    完成执行与成果报告

  • 报告号

    20663

  • 卷号

    1

  • Total Volume(s)

    1

  • 国家

    韩国,

  • 地区

    东亚与太平洋区,

  • 发布日期

    2010/06/18

  • Disclosure Status

    Disclosed

  • 文件名称

    Korea - Kwangju and Seoul Sewerage Project

  • 关键词

    wastewater treatment plant;Project Preparation and Appraisal;Land Acquisition and Resettlement;Economic Rate of Retum;early stages of implementation;increase in land value;wastewater collection and treatment;environmental clean-up;water conservation studies;sewerage treatment plant;sewage treatment plant;operations and maintenance;conservation of water;operation and management;net present value;principal performance ratings;biochemical oxygen demand;water and wastewater;rates of return;water quality;impact on tariff;surface water quality;allocation of fund;internal cash generation;water conservation program;government's development priorities;wastewater treatment facility;prudent financial management;promoting water conservation;outputs by components;impact of water;water conservation objective;amount of water;sound financial management;quality assurance group;national environmental fund;reduction of leakage;ratings of bank;quality at entry;quality of water;cost equipment;cost of equipment;exchange rate fluctuation;construction and operation;exchange rate variation;wastewater agencies;city government;interceptor sewer;sewerage tariff;finance objective;borrower performance;construction work;project costing;sewage tariff;civic groups;institutional improvement;Exchange Rates;financial rate;wastewater discharge;pumping station;treatment capacity;local public;monitoring data;bid price;tariff level;wastewater system;water leakage;water saving;housing development;Loan Projects;suspended solid;tariff increase;financial viability;wastewater sector;water pollution;pollution prevention;leakage control;cleaner environment;plant operation;project datum;property value;financial covenant;institutional objectives;government control;wastewater operation;improved health;competitive bidding;high capital;sewerage sector;wastewater investment;sustainability rating;urban development;construction cost;financial situation;local bank;general accounts;weak foundation;social affairs;monthly payment;Urban Infrastructure;Population Growth;administrative capacity;primary author;local operator;private operator;management technique;sewage system;private enterprise;wastewater facility;public corporation;financial goal;original amount;citizen groups;loan request;national assembly;data request;rapid industrialization;borrower's performance;counterpart fund;wastewater strategy;professional knowledge;project sustainability;suburban area;urban population;market price;private company;private operation;cut off;environmental facility;special account;treated sewage;extension work;supply management;construction funds;achievement level;population increase;high urbanization;sports facilities;Parking Lot;expansion plan;secondary treatment;environmental situation;stated objective;transition arrangement;treatment facilities;operational staff;local company;skill mix;social aspect;regular operations;water use;procurement arrangement;domestic funding;increase tariff;quality improvement;research institute;positive impact;health statistics;statistical method;construction supervision;government's commitment;environment assessment;compensation policy;tested technologies;Water Demand;land compensation;project identification;procurement documents;wastewater management;environmental laboratory;treated effluent;environmental group;government commitment;cost-benefit analysis;civil works;asian crisis;local counterpart;environmental standard;dispute arising;technological improvement;aeration tank;extensive study;river environment;separate account;wastewater tariff;discount rate;targeted rate;cash surplus;regulatory management;Project Monitoring;reinforced plastic;environmental requirement;delivery capacity;production facility;institutional aspect;financial parameter;working capital;account receivable;cash basis;financial statement;court system;monitoring indicator;government play;aquatic area;government support;legal owner;accounting standard;accounting standards;project goals

下载

完整報告

正式文件版本(可能有签字)