Skip to Main Navigation

Telecommunications and the WTO : the case of Mexico (英语)

The U.S.-Mexico case is the first (and so far only) case of World Trade Organization (WTO) dispute resolution on telecommunications services and the first on services generally. The findings of the Panel charged with resolving the dispute, formally adopted by the WTO members, contain interpretations of the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS). WTO handling of the dispute concerning Mexico was initiated in 2000 by the U.S., following many months of bilateral efforts to resolve the issue directly between both countries. In August 2000 the U.S. requested consultations, under WTO auspices, on Mexico's obligations on basic and value-added services under the GATS Annex on Telecommunications and the Reference Paper. Successive rounds of consultations did not resolve the issues raised, and in February 2002 the U.S. formally requested the establishment of a Panel under revised claims (that no longer included value-added services). The Panel issues its final report in March 2004, agreeing mostly with the U.S. claims, but found that Mexico had not committed to allow international simple resale and thus was not in violation of its obligations on that count. Although the parties claimed not to be satisfied with all aspects of the Panel findings, neither party elected to take the Panel decision to the WTO Appellate Body. As a result, the WTO's Dispute Settlement Body adopted the Panel report, by consensus, in June 2004. The parties agreed on, and submitted to the WTO, a plan to redress the underlying problems by July 2005.

详细

  • 作者

    Galarza, Juan, Guermazi,Boutheina, Wellenius,Bjorn

  • 文件日期

    2005/06/01

  • 文件类型

    工作文件

  • 报告号

    33194

  • 卷号

    1

  • Total Volume(s)

    1

  • 国家

    墨西哥,

    美国,

  • 地区

    拉丁美洲与加勒比海区, 世界其他国家,

  • 发布日期

    2005/08/03

  • Disclosure Status

    Disclosed

  • 文件名称

    Telecommunications and the WTO : the case of Mexico

  • 关键词

    round of multilateral trade negotiation;presence of natural persons;abuse of market power;federal communications law;Telecommunications;market access commitment;public telecommunications network;international telephone service;competitively neutral manner;dispute resolution panel;world war ii;provision of service;international long distance;world trade;legislation and regulation;long distance market;dispute settlement mechanism;country of destination;liberalization of trade;trade in services;dispute resolution process;global trading system;foreign service suppliers;freedom of movement;legally binding obligation;implementation of reform;rights of way;house of representative;dispute settlement panel;accounting rate;telecommunications service;commercial presence;national treatment;mobile service;termination charge;competition policy;Competition Law;specific commitment;foreign operators;international telecommunication;outgoing traffic;leased line;local access;european community;international accounting;international traffic;International Trade;cross-border services;essential facility;telecommunications market;internet development;international service;processing time;trade aspect;postal operator;dispute arising;interconnection service;incremental cost;consumption abroad;market position;regulatory principle;participating country;call charges;commonly known;interconnection cost;license requirement;global trade;leased circuits;telecommunications investment;transparent procedure;trade negotiators;sector specialist;protectionist trade;domestic reform;scarce resource;large operator;Universal Service;independent body;constructive dialogue;regulatory authority;primarily use;facsimile service;data transmission;interconnection charges;discriminatory manner;cross border;public voice;relevant market;customs tariff;domestic regulation;transport company;price competition;Courier Services;tourism sector;competition concerns;legal instrument;competitive safeguards;world economy;trade round;telecommunications company;telecommunications reform;treaty obligation;trade commitment;progressive liberalization;tour operator;hotel chain;regulatory practice;call revenue;fair trade;cross-border delivery;outbound traffic;switching capability;cross-border supply;historical perspective;nominal price;predatory pricing;Cash flow;

下载

完整報告

正式文件版本(可能有签字)