This paper presents a game theory model of the strategic interaction between Khartoum and Juba leading up to the referendum on Sudan's partition in 2011. The findings show that excessive militarization and brinksmanship is a rational response for both actors, neither of which can credibly commit to lower levels of military spending under the current status quo. This militarization is often at the expense of health and education expenditures, suggesting...
更多显示
详细
-
2008/07/01
-
政策研究报告
-
WPS4684
-
1
-
1
-
2010/07/01
-
Disclosed
-
Referendum, response, and consequences for Sudan : the game between juba and khartoum
-
military expenditure