Skip to Main Navigation

China - Energy Efficiency Financing Project (英语)

Ratings of Energy Efficiency Financing Project for China were as follows: outcomes were satisfactory, Global Environment Objective (GEO) outcomes were satisfactory, risk to development outcome was low or negligible, risk to GEO outcome was low or negligible, and Bank performance was satisfactory. Some of the lessons learned included: (i) Participating Financial Intermediary PFIs’ commitment and internal organization are essential factors in the success of Energy Efficiency (EE) lending; (ii) TA has a high payoff; (iii) Generating sufficient deal flows has not been easy; (iv) Balance sheet financing remains the preferred model for bank lending; (v) Building EE remains an extremely tough market segment for financing institutions to lend to; (vi) Flexibility in project design is required; (vii) Timing of implementation can lead to challenges, requiring flexibility to respond; (viii) Long-term, programmatic engagement has substantial impact; and (ix) To the extent that the project was achieved its goals in a cost effective manner, it owes much to the competent project management teams, with contributions from world-class international and Chinese experts.

详细

  • 文件日期

    2017/06/28

  • 文件类型

    完成执行与成果报告

  • 报告号

    ICR4130

  • 卷号

    1

  • Total Volume(s)

    1

  • 国家

    中国,

  • 地区

    东亚与太平洋区,

  • 发布日期

    2017/07/06

  • Disclosure Status

    Disclosed

  • 文件名称

    China - Energy Efficiency Financing Project

  • 关键词

    energy conservation;industrial energy conservation;decentralization of decision making;range of efficiency technology;Project Preparation and Appraisal;total primary energy consumption;per capita energy consumption;adverse environmental impact;energy conservation investments;ton of coal;quality at entry;quality of supervision;domestic banking sector;annual energy saving;national policy;local air quality;improving energy efficiency;outputs by components;capacity building program;types of energy;insufficient institutional capacity;intermediate outcome;source of energy;energy management company;lack of demand;risk management tool;energy performance contracting;foreign exchange risk;financial and operating;rates of return;energy savings performance;lines of credit;demand for power;knowledge management program;energy consuming sector;energy conservation programs;international good practice;commercial bank financing;energy service companies;energy service company;industrial enterprise;energy intensity;energy intensities;industrial sector;co2 emission;financial intermediaries;beneficiary enterprise;eligibility criterion;financial risk;business startup;commercial financing;operational capacity;investment cost;lending business;good performance;financing mechanism;primary author;equity financing;public fund;debt finance;project finance;project pipeline;government priority;coal equivalent;national energy;payback period;financial product;Carbon Financing;industrial facility;building sector;energy-intensive industry;Project Monitoring;finance knowledge;viable business;industrial investment;sound financial;energy price;management fee;financial intermediation;management capacity;investment program;smaller one;commercial lending;loan finance;operational failures;delivery mechanism;institutional mechanism;operational inefficiency;direct beneficiaries;technology platform;credit line;mitigation measure;loan fund;institutional memory;regular staff;preparatory work;staff capability;commercially viable;green growth;adequate risk;working relationship;Clean Energy;financial instrument;mitigation efforts;incentive mechanism;weak demand;industrial economy;target market;leverage ratio;Indicator Target;business practice;business segment;procurement threshold;strategic focus;innovative process;involuntary resettlement;energy need;auditing principle;evaluation procedure;delivery schedule;business interruption;project types;financial statement;global environmental;manufacturing industry;management weaknesses;energy expenditure;stakeholder workshop;provincial boundaries;Lending Product;industrial technology;industrial boiler;heat exchange;construction material;Portfolio Support;investment objective;external partner;local branch;business financing;regulation concern;pollutant emission;financial return;investment finance;technology development;investment good;institutional context;project financing;fiscal incentive;exchange rate;Exchange Rates;business expansion;deal origination;potential investment;central agencies;Environmental Policy;coal consumption;regulatory intervention;results framework;internal capacity;market potential;risk perception;aggregate energy;energy-intensive manufacturing;lending agency;additional revenue;energy-efficient equipment;financial benefit;financing instrument;remedial measure;industrial system;conservation policy;waste heat;Environmental Assessment;electrical equipment;economic slowdown;profit margin;currency denomination;market condition;lending rate;project costing;carbon fund;state council;business model;

下载

完整報告

正式文件版本(可能有签字)