Skip to Main Navigation

The new moneylenders : are the poor being exploited by high microcredit interest rates (英语)

Over the past two decades, institutions that make micro loans to low-income borrowers in developing and transition economies have focused increasingly on making their lending operations financially sustainable by charging interest rates that are high enough to cover all their costs. They argue that doing so will best ensure the permanence and expansion of the services they provide. Sustainable (i.e., profitable) microfinance providers can continue to serve their clients without needing ongoing infusions of subsidies, and can fund exponential growth of services for new clients by tapping commercial sources, including deposits from the public. This paper asks whether micro credit rates are abusively high. Obviously there can be no one-size fits- all answer to this question, not only because there are huge variations in the interest rates and related circumstances of individual Micro-finance institutions (MFIs) around the world, but also because there is no agreed standard for what is abusive. There is an intense dispute about how high interest rates and profits would have to be to qualify as excessive, and indeed about whether terms like this have any useful meaning, at least in the arena of for-profit microfinance.

Document also available in :  


  • 作者

    Rosenberg, Richard; Gonzalez, Adrian; Narain, Sushma;

  • 文件日期


  • 文件类型


  • 报告号


  • 卷号


  • Total Volume(s)


  • 国家


  • 地区


  • 发布日期


  • Disclosure Status


  • 文件名称

    The new moneylenders : are the poor being exploited by high microcredit interest rates?

  • 关键词

    Return on Average Assets;loan portfolio;credit union;interest yield;average cost;Return on Average Equity;average per capita income;loan loss;cost of fund;loan size;economies of scale;lower interest rate;return on asset;reduction of cost;lack of options;amount of cash;higher interest rate;credit card rate;consumer interest rate;international financial statistic;sum of cost;form of credit;distribution of return;returns on equity;cases of corruption;markets where competition;international investment fund;income from sources;access to finance;distribution of loan;interest rate cap;Risk Management Policies;risk management policy;administrative cost;large loans;transaction cost;peer group;interest income;small loan;commercial bank;private party;private parties;financial service;loan product;gross loans;informal credit;learning curve;microfinance;annual return;financial information;loan rate;low-income borrower;regression analysis;weighted average;consumer lending;fee income;private owner;interest charge;non-governmental organization;microfinance institution;bargaining power;microfinance service;core objectives;microcredit program;political risk;investment vehicle;public development;commercial investor;gross return;profit distribution;pricing arrangements;exponential growth;savings service;excessive loan;economic stress;default rate;single loan;bottom quartile;rural transportation infrastructure;macroeconomic environment;money transfer;savings mobilization;commercial investment;private shareholder;salary levels;staff salary;inverse relationship;outstanding loan;administrative expense;village banking;small sample;individual value;statistical evidence;banking authority;principal justification;microfinance industry;public offering;development perspective;banking license;average values;cost advantage;installment loan;average yield;informal loan;savings deposit;deep well;data limitation;loan fund;tax income;trend line;aggregate result;industry trend;multiple loan;information exchange;market cost;credit option;commercial company;simple average;potential borrower;interest earnings;deposit requirement;lending rate;alternative credit;public bank;transition economy;capital structure;business opportunity;after-tax profit;equity capital;regional median;management control;deposit funding;price taker;downward pressure;borrower default;political pressure;price sensitivity;government revenue;bank profitability;bargaining position;standard economic;bank data;large bank;public attention;Transition economies;bank rate;steep decline;government produce;net earning;commercial standard;compulsory saving;low-income people;efficient management;urban location;scale economy;physical infrastructure;variable cost;microfinance market;initial loan;microcredit loan;statistical results;efficiency improvement;repayment capacity;